Kiwi mountaineers have gone soft
The New Zealand Alpine Club will this weekend host a debate at their Annual General Meeting to discuss what can be done about the decline in mountaineering activity in NZ.
The debate is open to the public, so come along, it should be an interesting night!
There was some good coverage on Morning Report on National Radio this morning. For those that missed it, please follow the link below:
http://podcast.radionz.co.nz/mnr/mnr-20091014-0852-Alpine_club_says_Kiwi...
And last Friday's press release from Pat Deavoll:
Pat Deavoll
New Zealand Alpine Club
Event and Activities Co-ordinator
Ph. 03 377 7595
Mob. 021 216 1386
NEW ZEALAND ALPINE CLUB, CHRSTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND
Media Release
Friday, 9 October, 12.30pm
Is Mountaineering Dying in New Zealand?
The sport of mountaineering, once so much a part of the Kiwi heritage, is dying in New Zealand and the New Zealand Alpine Club (NZAC) is hosting a ‘debate,’ to try and identify why this is happening and what can be done about it.
A number of New Zealand’s best climbers will come together at ‘Our City, Otautahi,’ Christchurch, to discuss the dilemma as part of the NZAC Annual General Meeting on Friday.
NZAC Executive Director Ollie Clifton says a key indicator of the decline is the falling numbers of mountaineers using the Clubs mountain huts.
“The main huts at Mt Cook seem to be full of guided parties and tourists,” he said. “Where are all the Kiwi climbers? I think they have all gone soft! If we are going to have Sir Ed’s of the future, we need to take urgent action.”
Kester Brown, Managing Editor of the New Zealand Climber, the NZAC quarterly publication that documents the country’s climbing achievements, says it’s becoming increasingly hard to source alpine stories and images.
“I get plenty of information on rock climbing, bouldering and skiing, “he said, “but alpinism seems to be on the decline.”
Pete Cammell of Auckland, who will be elected the new President of the NZAC at Friday’s meeting, feels people don’t have mountaineering adventures anymore because there might be some hardship involved.
“Rather than an afternoon of exertion at the rock climbing crag, followed by a meal with friends, a comfy bed and a chance to update your Facebook page, in the mountains there’s a risk of the unexpected…a forced bivvy and of course big packs, early starts and long days. That would be too much suffering.”
The decline is reflected in the quality of mountaineering ascents New Zealand climbers are doing overseas, he says.
“Whereas New Zealand climbers used to be a world-leading, now we’ve slipped behind other climbing nations. We no longer have any up and coming Sir Ed’s.”
The debate starts at 7pm, Friday 16 at ‘Our City, Otautahi’ on the corner of Cashel and Worcester Sts and is open to the public.
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version
with absolutely no disrespect to Sir Ed, he was and could only be unique ... quite where we might 'find' another Sir Ed, or why we would want to is completely beyond me.. stop the cringing there is only one mt everest and thats been done, get over it..i cant believe the alpine club would go into print bemoaning the 'death' of mountainering.. rather then the death of so many mountaineers ....
yeah yeah there are loads of good reasons why folks dont want to suffer anymore , maybe its actually a more mature approach to the outdoors.. regardless i dont believe that because a strapping kiwi lad isnt riding on the coat-tails of one of historys biggest and most expensive alpine expeditions organised by england and supported by hundreds of sherpas that that is a reason to bemoan the 'softness' of kiwi alpinists
seems to me that plenty of kiwis are out doing radical stuff on less well known peaks in Alaska, Pakistan, China, Tibet, Nepal.. its just that to be honest its not big news anymore... face it big expeditions like Sir Eds are old, passe, dull as ditchwater and seldom achieve bugger all and the smaller expeditions are mildly fascinating (whilst still awesome experiences for those involved) to read about ...
in my experience there are a loads of folks doing cool sub alpine trips, long traverses, all sorts of wild missions that may not fit the classic description of 'alpine mountaineering' but are actually very full on adventures that involve any amount of commitment and suffering, think of the recent explorations and ascents around lake turner... very hard routes climbed onsight without the dramas of running around under icecliffs, crevasses or pulling on the appalling choss that passes for rock around mt cook
Sounds like a good idea to me
I just completed a FA of a new face (~6300m) in the Everest region of the Himilaya's with a 23 year old Kiwi. We discussed this topic at length he found it really hard to get into mountaineering in NZ and he was VERY keen. The break through seemed to come when the guy who runs the Mountainz website ran a free course. From this I take that there needs to be more mentoring of young aspiring mountaineers (who don’t have a lot of cash). This “training” needs to take them beyond the basic and intermediate snow school courses that NZAC run. Don’t get me wrong they are great courses I have helped instruct on them, but it’s a great leap to the next level, grade ~IV and above. The problem I have had when I have tried to do FAs in NZ is the bloody weather. The weather in the French Alps, Himilaya and I gather Peru, Bolivia is much more stable. I came to the conclusion you need to live in the South Island if you really want to break new ground.

...it's probably because all the hard ones have retired and taken up other sports, like sailing.